Six AI employees work inside your Clio, Westlaw, iManage, and QuickBooks — researching case law, catching deadlines, finding unbilled time, reviewing contracts, and capturing clients. Then they send you one Slack message with [Approve] or [Deny]. You make 8–12 decisions a day. They handle everything else.
A team of 6 specialized AI employees that handle the operational work legal teams usually spread across junior staff — legal research, client intake, document review, billing, and more. Each agent works inside your existing tools, escalates exceptions to a human, and is deployed in 8 to 12 weeks.
A 30-person law firm deployed AI agents for preliminary case research, jurisdiction analysis, and precedent identification — reducing research time by half in the first quarter.
Read the full case study →Each scenario below costs law firms thousands per month. Your AI employees catch them automatically — and ask you what to do.
A personal injury statute of limitations in Martinez v. Greenfield expires Tuesday. The matter was opened 11 months ago. Nobody calendared the filing deadline. The paralegal who handled intake left the firm last month. The malpractice exposure exceeds $500,000.
"CRITICAL: Martinez v. Greenfield SOL expiring Tuesday. 2 business days. No filing activity logged. [Confirm Filed]"
Three associates in the commercial litigation group forgot to record 14 hours of research time this week. A partner sent 8 emails on the Henderson matter after 9 PM and never billed them. Total unbilled WIP: $34,000 that would have been written off at month-end.
"$34K unbilled WIP detected. 14 hrs research (3 associates), 2.3 hrs emails (Partner Collins). [Send Time Summaries]"
The Meridian contract renewal contains an unlimited liability provision buried in Section 14.3 and an IP assignment clause that exceeds jurisdictional enforceability limits. The associate who reviewed it missed both. The client would have signed tomorrow.
"2 HIGH-RISK clauses in Meridian renewal: unlimited liability (S14.3), overbroad IP assignment (S7.2). Redline drafted. [Review Redline]"
A prospective client submitted a business litigation enquiry at 11:47 PM Friday. Your receptionist does not work weekends. By Monday morning, the prospect has called three other firms. Average case value: $75,000.
"New enquiry qualified: Commercial dispute, $250K claim. Conflict check clear. Engagement letter sent. Consultation booked Monday 10 AM. [Review Intake]"
Clio, Westlaw, LexisNexis, iManage, QuickBooks. No new software.
Approve this memo? File before Tuesday? Bill this WIP? Accept this client?
Full context and buttons. Each decision takes 5–15 seconds.
Memo filed, deadline tracked, pre-bill sent, client onboarded. You move on.
Each one replaces a hire you cannot afford yet — or a role nobody is doing at all.
By the time you pour your first coffee, six employees have already worked a full shift — and left you a short list of decisions.
CaseText, Harvey, Lexis+ AI — they assist with research. That is one function. Research is 20% of the problem.
Smith.ai, Ruby, LawDroid — they answer phones and qualify leads. That is intake. What about deadlines, billing, contracts, communication?
Six employees, six roles, six sets of daily deliverables. They work. You approve. Your 70-hour week becomes a 40-hour week.
Every employee is architected around the bar's standards — siloed matters, encrypted data, immutable audit trails, and a human on every privileged call.
Every 100xforce AI employee for law firms is built to protect attorney-client privilege. Matter data is strictly siloed — no employee can access information across matters — and conflict-of-interest checks run automatically before any new client data enters the system.
All client data and work product are encrypted at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.3). Document integrations with iManage use your existing security protocols. No documents are stored outside your approved DMS — employees read and analyze in-place without creating unauthorized copies.
For firms with jurisdictional data-sovereignty obligations, 100xforce offers region-specific deployment options ensuring client data never leaves the required jurisdiction — critical for cross-border matters subject to varying data-protection regimes.
100xforce maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance. Every document accessed, research query executed, and deadline notification sent is timestamped with the employee identity and supervising lawyer in an immutable audit trail, retained per your bar association rules.
IOLTA and trust-account data handled by Sophie follows the same strict encryption and access-control standards. Reconciliation results are logged with full audit trails for bar association compliance.
For firms requiring enhanced security, 100xforce offers on-premise deployment where the runtime operates entirely within your network. Only anonymized, de-identified prompts reach the cloud LLM — no client names, matter numbers, or privileged content leaves your infrastructure.
No new software to learn. Your employees log into the systems your firm already runs on.
See how six AI employees handle a real day at a 15-attorney firm — Marcus delivers a research memo with Shepardized citations, James catches a missed statute of limitations, Sophie surfaces $34K in unbilled time, and Elena qualifies an after-hours prospect. Real responses, real approval-based workflows.
Everything partners ask before their first discovery session.
Book a Workforce Discovery session. We map your workflows and show you which AI employees would have the biggest impact on your firm.