Try the Recruitment AI workforce, live.

We just got 200 applicants for the Senior Backend Engineer role. Can you screen them today? I don’t have the bandwidth.

Absolutely. I’ll score all 200 against the role spec — skills, seniority, domain experience, and location. Give me a moment to process the batch.

Done. Of 200 applicants: 12 strong matches, 34 possible, 154 below the bar. The top 12 are ranked with reasoning — e.g. #1 has 7 yrs Go + distributed-systems depth and is in-region.

⚑ 200 CVs scored in under 2 minutes · multi-dimensional

Nice. Were any strong candidates hiding lower down that keyword filters would’ve missed?

Yes — two. One lists "Golang" not "Go", another described the skill in prose without the keyword. Both surfaced because I score on inferred competency, not keyword matching. I’ve flagged the full ranked shortlist for your review — you make the interview call.

⚑ Recruiter decides who advances — AI ranks, humans choose

I need final rounds scheduled for 3 candidates across 5 interviewers by Friday. It’s a nightmare of calendars.

I can take that off your plate. I’ll pull availability for all 5 interviewers and the 3 candidates, including time zones, and find slots that work for a full panel. One moment.

Found it: candidate A Thursday 2 PM, candidate B Friday 10 AM, candidate C Friday 3 PM — each with all 5 interviewers free. I’ve drafted calendar invites with the scorecard and résumé attached, ready to send.

⚑ Cross-timezone panel matched — no email ping-pong

One interviewer is out Friday afternoon actually. Can you rework candidate C?

Reworked — candidate C moves to Friday 11:30 AM, which keeps the full panel and avoids the conflict. Invites are queued for your one-click approval before anything goes to candidates.

⚑ You approve before invites send

Heads up on the Engineering Manager candidate, Priya. I’ve completed the reference checks and one of the three raised a concern worth your attention before we advance the offer.

Oh. What came up?

Two references were strongly positive on delivery and technical leadership. The third — a former direct report — gave measured feedback about communication under pressure. It’s not a red flag on its own, but it’s a pattern worth exploring, so I’ve documented all three verbatim.

⚑ References logged verbatim — Nina reports, humans judge

Should we drop the candidate?

That’s your and the client’s hiring decision — I don’t make it. I’ve prepared a summary with the three references side by side and 4 suggested follow-up questions you could put to the candidate to probe the concern directly. It’s in your inbox for review.

⚑ Escalated with context — hiring call stays human